Comparative Performance of Multi-Platform DEMs and Topographic Sheets in Fluvial Morphometry: Insights from the Jiadhal River Basin, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58825/jog.2025.19.2.236Keywords:
Basin Morphometry, Digital Elevation Model, AW3D, ASTER, SRTM, Cartosat, TanDEM-X, ToposheetAbstract
This study evaluates the performance of various Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and Survey of India (SOI) topographic sheets in fluvial morphometry using the upper part of the Jiadhal River basin as a case study. The primary objective is to compare and assess the interchangeability of data derived from SRTM, ASTER, AW3D, TanDEM-X, Cartosat 30m DEMs, and SOI 1:50,000 scale topographic sheets. Key morphometric parameters such as stream order, stream length, drainage density, drainage texture, basin area, perimeter, and relief aspects were derived from each dataset and compared to determine the influence of spatial resolution on hydrological studies. Results indicate that DEMs such as AW3D, Cartosat capture finer landform features better and provide added precision in stream delineation, mostly in flat terrains, as compared to other data sources. Despite variations in satellite’s spatial resolutions, parameters and sensor systems, the derived fluvial morphometric parameters and statistics from the DEMs and topographic sheets showed significant agreement overall. The study highlights that AW3D, Cartosat 30m DEM outperforms SRTM, ASTER and TanDEM-X in stream path delineation, and are recommended for future morphometric and river basin studies. This research highlights the significance of choosing appropriate DEMs based on their spatial resolutions as well as terrain characteristics of the river basin for improved morphometric and river basin analysis.
References
Ahmed, S. A., K. N. Chandrashekarappa, S. K. Raj, V. Nischitha and G. Kavitha (2010). Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from ASTER and SRTM DEM—A study on Bandihole sub-watershed basin in Karnataka. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 38(2), pp. 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0029
Bhanudas, K. T., K. Balasubramani and M. Gomathi (2017). Comparative analysis of CARTOSAT, ASTER and SRTM digital elevation models of different terrains for extraction of watershed parameters. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321272177
Bogale, A. (2021). Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using geographical information system in Gilgel Abay watershed, Lake Tana Basin, upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Applied Water Science, 11(7), 122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01447-9
Croneborg, L., K. Saito, M. Matera, D. McKeown and J. Van Aardt (2020). Digital elevation models: A guidance note on how digital elevation models are created and used – includes key definitions, sample terms of reference, and how best to plan a DEM mission. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/cirated/en/667961599807477538
Das, P. J. (2013). Jadhal River Catchment, Assam, India: Building community capacity for flash flood risk management. Case Studies on Flash Flood Risk Management in the Himalayas, In Support of Specific Flash Flood Policies. Available at: http://lib.icimod.org/record/27767
Deo, R., M. Jain and Y. S. Rao (2016). Comparison of TanDEM-X and Cartosat-1 stereo DEMs over different terrains of India. 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 10–15 July 2016. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7730694
Desta, L., V. Carucci, A. Wendem-Agenehu and Y. Abebe (2005). Community based participatory watershed development: A guideline, 1st edn. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MoARD), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Garbrecht, J. and L. W. Martz (1997). The assignment of drainage direction over flat surfaces in raster digital elevation models. Journal of Hydrology, 193, pp. 204–213.
Gesch, D. B. (2012). Global digital elevation model development from satellite remote sensing data. In Yang, X. and Li, J. (eds.) Advances in Mapping from Remote Sensor Imagery: Techniques and Applications. pp. 92–109.
Grohmann, C. H. (2018). Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30. Remote Sensing of Environment, 212, pp. 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.043
Guth, P. L., A. Van Niekerk, C. H. Grohmann, J.-P. Muller, L. Hawker, I. V. Florinsky, D. Gesch, H. I. Reuter, V. Herrera-Cruz, S. Riazanoff, C. López-Vázquez, C. C. Carabajal, C. Albinet and P. Strobl (2021). Digital elevation models: Terminology and definitions. Remote Sensing, 13(18), 3581. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183581
Horton, R. E. (1932). Drainage-basin characteristics. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 13(1), pp. 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR013i001p00350
Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56(3), pp. 275–370.
Krupavathi, C., S. S. Gowd, M. Rajasekhar and P. Ravikumar (2024). Morphometric analysis of Mogamureru river basin at the YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh, India using GIS and remote sensing. Geomatica, 76(1), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomat.2024.100005
Lakshmi, S. E. and K. Yarrakula (2019). Review and critical analysis on digital elevation models. Geofizika, 35(2), pp. 129–157. https://doi.org/10.15233/gfz.2018.35.7
Langbein, W. B. (1947). Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper, 968, pp. 125–157.
Miller, V. C. (1953). A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Technical Report, No. 3, Columbia University Department of Geology.
Nagaveni, C., K. P. Kumar and M. V. Ravibabu (2019). Evaluation of TanDEM-X and SRTM DEM on watershed simulated runoff estimation. Journal of Earth System Science, 128(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-018-1035-z
Niyazi, B., S. Zaidi and M. Masoud (2019). Comparative study of different types of digital elevation models on the basis of drainage morphometric parameters (Case study of Wadi Fatimah Basin, KSA). Earth Systems and Environment, 3(3), pp. 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-019-00111-2
Pandya, D., V. K. Rana and T. M. V. Suryanarayana (2024). Inter-comparison and assessment of digital elevation models for hydrological applications in the Upper Mahi River Basin. Applied Geomatics, 16(1), pp. 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-023-00547-2
Pareta, K. and U. Pareta (2011). Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2(1), pp. 248–269.
Peckham, S. D. (2009). Geomorphometry in RiverTools. in Hengl, T. and H. I. Reuter (eds.) Geomorphometry: Concepts, software, applications. Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 33. Elsevier, pp. 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00018-4
Rana, V. K. and T. M. V. Suryanarayana (2019). Visual and statistical comparison of ASTER, SRTM, and Cartosat digital elevation models for watershed. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-019-0036-z
Reuter, H. I., T. Hengl, P. Gessler and P. Soille (2009). Preparation of DEMs for geomorphometric analysis. In Hengl, T. and H. I. Reuter (eds.) Geomorphometry: Concepts, software, applications. Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 33. Elsevier, pp. 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00004-4
Roy, S., M. G. Uddin, K. Abdelrahman, M. S. Fnais and M. Abioui (2025). Assessing the impact of digital elevation model resolution on hypsometric analysis in large river basins (India): A non-parametric statistical approach. Earth Science Informatics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01607-w
Shekar, P. R. and A. Mathew (2022). Morphometric analysis for prioritizing sub-watersheds of Murredu River basin, Telangana State, India, using a geographical information system. The Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 69(1), p. 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00094-4
Strahler, A. N. (1950). Davis’ concepts of slope development viewed in the light of recent quantitative investigations. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 40(3), pp. 209–213.
Strahler, A. N. (1952a). Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63(9), pp. 923–938. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[923:DBOG]2.0.CO;2
Strahler, A. N. (1952b). Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63(11), pp. 1117–1142.
Strahler, A. N. (1954). Statistical analysis in geomorphic research. Journal of Geology, 62(1), pp. 1–25.
Strahler, A. N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 38(6), pp. 913–920. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913
Strahler, A. N. (1958). Dimensional analysis applied to fluvially eroded landforms. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 69(3), pp. 279–300.
Strahler, A. N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In Chow, V. T. (ed.) Handbook of Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 4-39–4-76.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Geomatics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
